Before our session Thursday, I wanted to update the players on a few rules updates (inclusions really) that I had not previously been to stringent on. Here I will gab about them for no other reason than this is my blog. ;)
Movement (and therefore encumbrance). I recently listened to a play report that included a dungeon battle in 5 foot wide tunnels. During the battle, the width of tunnels and the movement of characters came into play in a big way. Marching order in a 5 foot wide tunnel, where it would be very difficult to squeeze past the leader to fight the bad guys, it very important. I realized I had been very loosey-goosey with this and allowed the players far too much leeway in moving around in combat. This brought up two distinct points we needed to discuss:
1) Encumbrance. I had not really been tracking this at all, relying on the players (and me) to keep an eye on reality or carrying an asston of stuff. I have decided we will be using the Basic Encumbrance rules from OSE. Essentially I will limit movement to the armor worn listing as the group enters a dungeon/adventure, once they start carrying stuff, we will take a closer look at things. As the change between with-treasure and without-treasure is quite different especially for those in heavy armor I expect to have a direct effect on play. So movement will be based on the Option 1 rule for encumbrance below:
2) Movement. I never really focused on this in combat, and many times this will still not really come into play. Combat tends to be close and fast with characters only having to move slightly but in listening to that actual play I realized the I have been too loosey-goosey on movement as well. Moving forward I plan on being much more strict on movement and actions. Players will have two options:
- Normal movement with a single action taken at any point during that move
- Sprint, moving twice their normal but no other actions.
The reason this is important is that it could have a major impact on situations where movement is limited. In the image below Olwen is facing off against a mounted rat and two giant rats. Brad and Usse are nearby and want to help. Last session the team loaded up their friend Brad with plate mail, a shield and sword, so his movement is 20' for combat, that is four squares given the 5' squares in the map. Usse though is a much more lean warrior, carrying only a pair of daggers.
If Brad's player moved him his full move, he would be positioned here (image below), and I would likely allow him to attack the diagonally connected square with the giant rat. However, now Brad is blocking the hall because squeezing past a character engaged in combat in a 5 foot wide tunnel is difficult. So, because Brad is weighted down and armored up and this impacts the faster, less armored party members.
I think clear movement rules are very important. For all its faults, one thing 3x did pretty well was to define what - exactly - could be done in a round. The idea of a move action (move 30', draw, draw a weapon, get up from prone, drink a potion) AND a melee action (attack, shoot an arrow, cast a spell) really clarified things for me as a player and DM. Your options here really mirror that well and it makes things easier in your game. Good job!ReplyDelete
Gah! You said 3e! Now I have to wash my eyeballs out and clean them off! ;)Delete
I tend to let people get away with doing far too much in game. In a game I had a player say "I put my longbow on my back, grab my shield, draw my long sword, and take a swing at the monster." Like really dude? Try all that in real life (not to mention the 4-6 foot longbow's size) and let me know how that works out in real life.
Encumbrance is a real issue. How many people are wearing two quivers, a backpack, their bow, a magical cape, and strap a shield to their back? Encumbrance is not only weight, but bulk as well. A big old quiver with 20 arrows in it is pretty good size. Show me how you wear that AND a backpack. I'll wait.